|
Standard Marking of Major Mechanical Errors
Many college instructors use a notation system for grading papers that is widely recognized.
Click here to view this standard set of markings.
Apostrophe
Errors
Apostrophes are used almost
exclusively for two purposes:
Contractions
(two words squeezed together to form one).
Correct apostrophe placement = insert where letters are left out
They dont
care.
(dont = do + not) |
Theyre my
friends.
(Theyre = They + are) |
Noun possessives (nouns—not
pronouns—to which something/someone belongs).
Correct apostrophe placement = after the
noun possessor(s) and
before the possessive -s if one is needed.*
|
This is Sarah’s
sweater. |
Sarah’s
= it belongs to Sarah |
|
The girls’
locker room stinks. |
girls’
= it belongs to the girls |
Click
here for simple, step by step
instructions on correct apostrophe
and -s placement
for noun possessives.
Fragments
A fragment is a group of words
punctuated as a sentence but lacking completeness.
Correct it
by adding to it the group of words, usually found in the
sentence directly
before or after the fragment, that makes
its sense a complete thought.
| Fragment |
Corrected |
| When I got home. I made
myself a Pepsi float. |
When I got home, I made
myself a Pepsi float. |
Can't
recognize your own fragments unless
someone else points them out? Click here for hints
on how to break the fragment habit.
Run-ons, Comma Splices, and
Fused Sentences
Run-ons, comma splices, and fused sentences
are all two or more sentences inadequately
or inappropriately joined together. Acceptable ways of joining sentences
together include:
- Comma plus coordinating
conjunction (and, or, nor, but, so, for)
- Semicolon by itself or with
a subordinating conjunction.
- Make one of the sentences
into a clause dependent upon the other and punctuate
appropriately.
Correct any of the three errors
by locating where one sentence ends and the next begins, then
adding an appropriate conjunction and/or punctuation. Do not
expect to use the same method of correction for every
instance of error, however, because the best way of joining
two sentences is determined by the context and style of the
passage in which they are found. In modern American English,
semicolons are generally only used when the two sentences
being joined are very short and/or very closely connected in
form and meaning.
| Run-on |
We went to Springdale
and we were disappointed. |
| Comma splice |
We went to Springdale,
we were disappointed. |
| Fused sentence
|
We went to Springdale
we were disappointed. |
A few
possible corrected versions:
| We went to Springdale, and
we were disappointed. |
| We went to Springdale; we
were disappointed. |
| We went to Springdale;
consequently, we were disappointed. |
| When we went to Springdale,
we were disappointed. |
| We went to Springdale, and
boy were we disappointed! |
The
punctuation rules of Standard Edited
American English are slightly different
from the Englishes used in contemporary
journalism and some technical writing.
For a discussion of the differences
relevant to this comma rule, click
here.
Subject/Verb Agreement Errors
Singular nouns must have
singular verbs; plural nouns must have plural verbs.
| Incorrect |
Corrected |
| He make the bed every
morning. |
He makes the bed every
morning. |
| We was best friends. |
We were best friends. |
| One of the pillows are
torn. |
One of the pillows is torn. |
Click
here
for tips on how to make the spelling
and grammar checker of your word processing
software help you find your most frequent
errors before your professor does.
Pronoun/Antecedent Agreement Errors
A pronouns must agree in gender
and number with its antecedent, the recently mentioned noun or pronoun to which
it refers. There are several errors that result from not following this
rule.
Sexist usage: Gender
non-specific antecedents are particularly troublesome, since there is no
singular, gender non-specific, personal pronoun in English. In the
past, the masculine personal pronoun (he, him, his) was used in such cases,
but this is now regarded as incorrect usage. It is also incorrect to
substitute the plural gender non-specific pronoun their for the singular,
although this is the most common solution in informal speech.
|
Incorrect |
Reason |
|
A person needs to
get his life together. |
person
is gender non-specific; his is gender specific = sexist usage |
|
A person needs to
get their life together. |
person
is singular; their is plural = agreement error in standard,
edited English |
|
A person needs to
get his/her life together.
or
A person needs to get his or her life together. |
Both constructions
are awkward and formulaic sounding and draw attention toward the
nonsexist usage issue and away from what the sentence is saying. |
In correcting such gender related
pronoun/agreement errors,
consider both what exactly youre trying to say and any
relevant issues of gender discrimination. Correction generally involves
rewriting the whole sentence—and perhaps surrounding sentences as well. A
rule of thumb: go plural, go specific, or omit (if the pronoun is
unnecessary), depending on your purpose.
|
Repair Strategies |
A few possible
corrections |
|
Pluralize the
singular antecedent. |
People should get
their lives together. |
|
Use one. |
One should get
one’s life together. |
|
Specify the
antecedent, and use a gender appropriate pronoun. |
My sister should
get her life together. |
Incorrect use of second person "you": A common but less recognizable
form of pronoun/antecedent agreement is the use of you
to mean someone other than the reader. For very informal spoken or
written English, this may be acceptable, but in formal English it is not.
Writers make this error for a variety of reasons. To correct, rethink
the sentence and identify the actual agent of what is said in the sentence
or select one of the strategies above.
|
The writer is
struggling with the same lack of a gender non-specific, personal
pronoun describe above under the heading "Sexist Usage." |
|
The writer has been
told in the past never to say I and is using you to
avoid doing so. |
|
The writer intends
a general subject but is uncomfortable using the general pronoun
one.* |
|
Taking credit for
the subject matter is distressing to the writer for some reason. It
may be sensitive personal material, or it may be a sweeping
generalization or a flat out lie. Some writers lack confidence about
the truth of what they are arguing. Using you in place of I
is a way of shifting accountability for what is written away from
the writer. |
*For
more on the pronoun one and how to
use it correctly, click
here.
Vague pronoun reference: There is one final pronoun/antecedent agreement
error that beginning writers often make: beginning a sentence with the
demonstrative pronoun This without there being, in the preceding
sentence, a noun or noun clause that could function as the pronoun's
antecedent. Example:
|
Christians, in their zeal to love one another, often avoid confronting one
another, even though many biblical writers urge confrontations. This
can lead to significant difficulty in arguing effectively and logically.
Many Christians never learn how to argue effectively because they feel
that arguing is wrong in the first place. |
The italicized demonstrative pronoun This
has no clear antecedent. To fix the problem, ask yourself what This
refers to and substitute it for the demonstrative pronoun. In the
example, This seems to refer to something like
"Inexperience in confrontations," which could be
substituted. Sometimes all it takes is a noun inserted after This
to make the reference clear, as in "This avoidance. . ." The
problem can be avoided altogether by following the advice of many writing
instructors of not beginning sentences with demonstrative pronouns at all,
but such extreme measures are not necessary as long as you make sure that your antecedent is clearly present in the preceding
sentence any time you begin a sentence with This.
Spelling Errors
With the advent of word processing
software, there is no excuse for spelling errors in edited prose. All word processing programs
have spell checkers which can be turned on or off. When
turned on, they work basically like this: they compare the
words you type to words in a repository of acceptable words
called a dictionary and then alert you in some fashion that a
word that is not in the dictionary may be misspelled. Most
spell checkers also highlight repeated words. Many spell
checkers can also be set to automatically correct certain
common typographical errors, such as thier for their.
Words such as proper nouns or colloquial expressions that one
would not ordinarily find in a book-style dictionary will not
be included in the program's dictionary. If the software
alerts you that a word that one would expect to find in a
dictionary is not in the dictionary, use a book-style
dictionary to find out the correct way to spell a word. Also,
a spell checker will miss a spelling error that is an actual
word but just not the word you need--such as too
when you mean to, its when you mean it's, their when you mean they're
or there, or from when you mean form.
Need an introduction to the spellchecker?
Click
here.
Incorrect Verb Forms
In the English language, a composite
language influenced by the grammars of a variety of very different
languages, about the only verb
rule you can depend on is that the third person singular of
the present tense must end in s. There are many different ways to
make verbs’ simple past and past participle forms, and a few verbs even have
more than one acceptable form. In addition, regional and social and even age
dialects often exchange one verb form for another or use forms not
acceptable in standard edited English. As a result, writers often get past
and past participle forms wrong. A few of the zillion examples of incorrect
verb forms include:
|
They brung
their parents. |
|
She give me
that paper already. |
|
He would’ve went
yesterday, but he didn’t have time. |
|
We already drunk
our milk. |
|
This be the
best book I ever read. |
|
I seen him
shoot that buck myself. |
|
He flinged
his shoe out of the car window. |
If you don’t know the correct form of a
verb or if the one you thought was correct has been marked wrong, the
easiest way to find out the correct form is to look up the infinitive form
of the verb in a dictionary. Depending on the dictionary,
the principle forms of the verb are listed after the verb in
a certain order (see your dictionarys introduction for
details). After you find the correct form, memorize it. The
verb be is an exception to almost any rule, and all its parts should
be memorized.
As with your common spelling errors, keep
a record of any verb form errors you
make, and then learn and memorize
the correct form.
Let
the spelling and grammar checker help you. Click
here.
Misplaced or Dangling
Modifiers
A misplaced modifier is a word,
phrase, or clause (usually adjectival) which is located next
to something it does not modify and thus seems to modify it,
causing confusion and often unintended humor. Multi-word
constructions such as participial phrases, elliptical
clauses, verbal phrases, and sometimes even prepositional
phrases are the most commonly misplaced modifiers. Most
misplaced modifiers "dangle" at the beginning or
end of sentences, and thus misplaced modifiers are often
referred to as dangling modifiers. Sometimes the word
actually being modified is located elsewhere in the sentence,
and sometimes it is not present in the sentence at all but is
elliptical or only implied.
Correcting generally involves
rewriting the whole sentence so as to supply the word
modified and locate the modifier directly next to it.
| Misplaced
modifier |
Strategy |
A few possible
corrections |
| Weighing
ninety-seven pounds, football was too dangerous
for James. |
Relocate noun modified
next to modifier. |
Weighing ninety-seven
pounds, James found football too dangerous. |
| Driving down the
road, an armadillo was seen. |
Supply the elliptical
modified word by rewriting the main clause in active voice> |
Driving down the road
we saw an armadillo. |
| Coming home late,
the house was dark. |
Rewrite the
participial phrase as a clause. |
When we got home, the
house was dark. |
Parallel Structure
When listing or coordinating words, use the
same grammatical form for each unit. Each item must fit into the
sentence the same way as the first item named
|
Parallel structure
error |
Strategy |
A few possible
corrections |
| I like writing in
my journal, walking in moonlight, and to ski. |
Use either
the infinitive or the present participle form of each item listed. |
I like writing in my
journal, walking in moonlight, and skiing. |
| My sister's husband is
tall, olive skinned, and has a beard. |
The third item in the list
does not complete the sentence the same way as the first two
items. Rewrite the sentence. |
My sister's husband is
tall, olive skinned, and bearded.
My sister's husband is tall and olive
skinned and has a beard.
My sister's husband is tall and has
olive skin and a beard.
|
Overuse or Misuse of Passive Voice
Consider the following versions
of the same basic communication:
Active voice: The boy kicked
the doll.
Passive voice: The doll was kicked by the boy.
The "voice" of a verb
shows whether the doer or the receiver serves as the subject
of the verb. In active voice, the subject is the doer of the
action. In passive voice, the receiver of the action is the
subject of the sentence. Obviously, passive voice can only be
formed when there is a receiver of the action--in other
words, with a verb which takes an object (i.e., transitive
verb). Passive voice is used to focus the reader's attention
of this object rather than on the doer of the action, which
in a passive voice sentence is hidden away in a prepositional
phrase as the object of the preposition by. The
syntax of the passive voice sentence--in which the receiver
begins the sentence--makes the receiver of
the action so important that it is often possible to omit the
doer of the action entirely, as in
Passive voice: The doll was
kicked.
The use of passive voice is
correct and often expedient when the subject is not known or
important, as in
The man was arrested at the
border.
However, passive voice is often
overused and abused. It is a wordier and less direct way of
looking at what happened than active voice and is thus
considered to be a weaker and less honest construction than
active voice. Some writers use it to Others use it in order
to avoid saying "I," having been schooled not to
say "I" by teachers of an older school of thinking
which sought to downplay the role of the individual writer in
what that writer is saying. This avoidance of "I"
is especially common in the sciences, perhaps as an effort to
divert attention from a fallible reporter or experimenter.
Because there is this history of the avoidance of
"I" in some academic subjects, or perhaps because
the construction is wordier, some writers use passive voice
in a mistaken attempt to sound more scholarly. Still others
use passive voice to avoid taking responsibility for their
own assertions.
Compare:
| Weakest--vague
and dishonest |
Weak--dishonest |
Stronger--honest
and clear, but unnecessarily wordy and obvious |
Strongest--honest,
succinct, and confident |
| Passive Voice, doer
omitted |
Passive Voice, doer
included |
Active voice using
"I" |
Active voice
assertion |
| It is generally thought
that cults are dangerous. |
It is thought by most
people that cults are dangerous. |
I think cults are
dangerous. |
Cults are dangerous. |
Passive
voice is recognizable by its form--a
form of the verb to be plus the past
participle of the main verb. Most
word processing software includes
a grammar checker which will flag
passive voice. To reformulate a passive
sentence in active voice, ask yourself
the following question--Who did what?--and
then rephrase your sentence in that
order in a tense appropriate to the
context of the sentence. If the result
of this rephrasing is a sentence beginning
with an obvious statement such as
I think or I believe
(Of course you think or believe what
you write, since you are the writer!),
simply omit those words to achieve
a clear, concise assertion.
Let
the spelling and grammar checker help you. Click
here.
Overuse of the Verb To
Be
Using anything over and over
again can irritate or bore the reader, but the repetition of
the verb to be is in addition indirect and wordy and
often results in the flabby nominalization of what could be
strong action verbs. Learn to recognize the tenses of to
be, and correct its overuse by reclaiming the action
words of the sentences as verbs and asking yourself, as for
passive voice, who did what?
| Excessive
nominalization with to be |
Stronger |
| Strict enforcement of
the speed limit by the police is essential in effecting a reduction
in traffic fatalities. |
Police should strictly
enforce the speed limit to reduce fatalities. |
|